Spent a lot of time on it, trying to figure out what went wrong with mkrom when cooking 4.00.xx roms. finally figured it, well, almostly. here is a short step by step tutorial for people who do not want to set up the complicated kitchen but wish to use mkrom as in the good old 3.17 time.
I assume you already know the rom flush process already, if given a NBF file. also you need a linux box with perl.
I know quite a few people struggled and have not had a clue. and I believe there is some bugs in the mkrom package that gives the trouble.
1. download the newest mkrom from http://xda-developers.com/~itsme/download/mkrom_136.zip. this is the only piece of software you would need.
2. unpack it to, say mkrom, directory. then make directories cfg
3. get hold of a copy of rom file and its corresponding paramter files. the parameter files can be obtained from the demo kitch download ftp://kitchen:[email protected]/data look inside the "00_base ROM" and the parameter files should be under cfg directory of each rom directory. bascially the parameter files tells mkrom, where to start to put added files and how large space there is. there are two blocks of space that can be used. so the file has format
wincever=4
start1=81740000
size1=00040000
start2=81b00000
size2=003c0000
startbmp=81ec0000
startop=81b00000
the first three lines are same for all 4.00.xx roms, start2 varies for different roms, startbmp is also the same for all roms. startop should be the same as start2. size2 will be startbmp-start2, remember they are all in hex. you can calculate how large space there is once you get hold of the start2 parameter.
anyway, put the parameter files under the mkrom/cfg directory, with name "params"
4. copy a rom file (.nbf), say rom.nbf, into mkrom directory and run "./setup rom.nbf". this will creates several files under cfg.
5. mkdir a directory mkrom/romfile, enter it and make another directory file , then type "../dumprom ../cfg/rom.nb1 -4 -d file"
here comes the first bug. the setup.sh tells you that dumprom can only be used in windows box. but in fact, there is a compiled dumprom for linux in the directory (you might need to set it to be executable though). however, this linux version does not put extracted files into the "file" directory as it is supposed to, instead it just write file as "file\xxx" where xxx is the actual file name extracted from rom. it is a bug but as long as we know it, not a big deal. the is someone posted a correct version of dumprom in this forum though.
6. you should be able to find three files (or with the "file\" prefix added) with name default.fdf initobj.dat initdb.ini. these are the three files that needs to be process as indicated by setup.sh. follow the instruction to create the default.reg initobj.txt initdb.ini and copy them to cfg directory.
7. make a directory mkdir/files. you are ready to create a clean rom now by running "./mkrom output.nbf", the created output.nbf should be fine.
So far so good, followed the instruction of mkrom. next would need to add our files. then comes the problem. if you add files into the mkrom/files directory, and run "./mkrom output.nbf" again, it is almost definitely that the created rom is bad. I am not 100% sure why, but here is what I believe:
the mkrom script scan files in the "files" directory and put files in there into the "files1", "files2" directory, each of them is supposed to fill the two space in rom starting from "start1" and "start2" in parameter file. the size of files under "file1" should be less than "size1", similar "files2" and 'size2". when mkrom does this, it is highly possible that the three critial files "default.fdf, initobj.dat, initdb.ini" are placed into "files2" directory instead of "files1" directory and renders the rom bad.
here is what I did
edit the mkrom.sh, delete the line that splits files in "files" into "files1, files2" directory. change the three lines that convert the three critial files so that these three files are created in "files1" directory instead of "files" directory. then put your files into "files1" and "files2". just be careful, keep the size less than specified by "size1" and "size2".
then you can run "./mkrom.sh output.nbf" as before, and the resulted rom will be good.
hope this helps. however still a couple of problems
1. the fdf2reg.pl won't recoganize the default.fdf extracted from 4.00.21 rom or 4.01.00 rom
2. if i change the content of initobj.txt, the created rom won't boot. I might have done something wrong in initobj.txt though. but I used to be able to do this for 3.17 rom
3. I did not try to modify registry, as my only purpose is to put my files into ROM to save space. all registry can be done later by installing the software and choose not to overwrite existing files in ROM. must simpler.
the unix version of dumprom does not decompress files, that is why your default.fdf etc seem corrupted.
this is because I only have the decompression code in the form of a binary library, which I have not figured out how to link to under linux.
the only use of dumprom under unix is to find the offsets in rom where filepointers to default.fdf etc should be patched.
I should maybe disable the '-f' option in dumprom for the unix version, to make things less confusing.
but it looks to me that the dumprom under linux worked for pre- 4.00.16 rom. only not for after 4.00.21 roms. so are they different?
maybe the default.fdf was not compressed in the 3.x roms?
I am quite sure it does not work for compressed files under linux - I just did not implement the compression routines.
dumprom worked with 4.00.05 4.00.11 4.00.16 roms. I cooked 4.00.11 and 4.00.16 roms, and the rom was fine. I never used windows box during the process. only when i tried 4.00.21 and 4.01.00, there was error. anyway, i don't care, since I need as much rom as possible and 4.00.11 seems to be the best choice for me.
thanks for writting mkrom, a terrific tool. I don't like the way xda-developers.com promoting kitchen but not mkrom. mkrom is much simpler to setup and run, as long as you know about linux. the kitchen is much more complicated to get it to work and most people don't actually need such flexibility I believe.
ok i installed cygiwin and was with u till step 5, then i am lost.. when i run step 6 dumprom (in DOS) gives me an ewrror here atr the first few lines from dumprom( wiht latest ATT official release)
img 00000000 : hdr=8c0a1000 base=8c078000 commandlineoffset=8c077fe0
img 00040000 : hdr=800cdde0 base=80000000 commandlineoffset=7fffffe0
img 00180000 : hdr=8024db88 base=80000000 commandlineoffset=7fffffe0
img 00380000 : hdr=8039b334 base=80000000 commandlineoffset=7fffffe0
img 00670000 : hdr=80be2c40 base=80000000 commandlineoffset=7fffffe0
img 00c00000 : hdr=80e99400 base=80000000 commandlineoffset=7fffffe0
img 01050000 : hdr=813efc74 base=80000000 commandlineoffset=7fffffe0
img 01400000 : hdr=815d2ba4 base=80000000 commandlineoffset=7fffffe0
img 015f0000 : hdr=815f0650 base=80000000 commandlineoffset=7fffffe0
img 017c0000 : hdr=81bba0a4 base=80000000 commandlineoffset=7fffffe0
ERROR: could not find pointer for ofs 8c0a1000
invalid romhdr ofs 8c0a1000
ERROR: could not find pointer for ofs 00000000
7fffffe0 - 80000000 L00000020 unknown 30315750 452d3142 412d474e 2d30332e 2d353030 62373239 2d2d2d2d 2d2d2d2d
80000000 - 80000004 L00000004 romsection id=ea0003fe
80000004 - 80000040 L0000003c NUL
80000040 - 80000048 L00000008 'ECEC' -> 8c0a1000
errorsgalore...
so help me here how do i make sure the files extracted are all good also the size (as per ) windows explorer is 33+ not sure how all has been installed in the 32mb rom
did you get default.fdf initobj.dat initdb.ini out of dumprom. dumprom also reported tons of errors but as long as you get the three files out, it is ok.
Dumprom tries to figure out for each byte in the rom what it does. If it doesn't know it says 'unknown' this is not an error, just that dumprom could not determine the use of this byte. The 'could not find 00000000' message means that it encountered a NULL pointer somewhere in rom where it did not expect it, the other one is a pointer to RAM, which dumprom does not know exists. You can safely ignore these errors.
Dumprom was initially written to assist in figuring out what I did not know about the rom, so it tries to figure out stuff that is unknown. Later I added the code to extract files to it. Maybe I should split dumprom in one research tool, to do a detail examination of the rom, and one tool to only extract files.
Most files in rom are compressed, that is why they are more than 33M when uncompressed.
ok i understande the messages...
now here is what i did
ran ssnap and got a picture of the OS and did a compare and have a list of entries i want to add to registru and a folder with bunch of subfolders that need to be added on install
not sure how step 6 goes.. to convert the files to .reg and .txt and how/where do i add my files and registry entries....
any tips...
update...
i did fdf2reg and made a .reg file added my entries in there and then ran reg2fdf to recreatre the fdf...
i hope this is right now i need to fig out how to specify where the files i want added are to be copied i mean some go into windows some in new filders that need to be created...
plz tell me how to go forward.
you don't need to re-create the fdf file again, mkrom does it for you, you only need to take care of the default.reg file under cfg
I am not sure whether you can put files under directories other than \windows only. I did not try that. I suppose all files under /files1 and /files2 go to \windows directory just they happen to locate in different memory location in ROM
Related
I just make the special edition ROM trhought mkrom and I obtain the.nb1 file, but when I flash my xd and make the cold reset, it hangs on the welcome screen, it print the 3 lines in red in the right bottom and after that ..... Nothing....... sniff
Anyone could help me????
I used the .nbf file that comes with the program A of O2.
Thks
that means that the windows kernel, and gsm have initialized.
the system should then proceed to execute the stuff mentioned in registry key HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\init.
maybe something went wrong with default.fdf?
I use the default.fdf that comes with the mkrom.zip, I just extract it and copy the nk.nbf file and proceed, I didn´t modify anything.
thks
I try to make another ROM with diferent Default.fdf but it hangs too.
it could be the NK.nbf file???
can you tell me where is a link fot one NK.nbf valid?
I´m going crazy :shock: jeje
thanks
if you use a different source rom, you need to change your default.fdf to
the one from that rom.
thanks for your patience,
I extract the default.fdf from the NK.nbf with dumprom.exe.
and then I use the fdf2reg.pl to create the default.reg and I put this file in the cfg directory, and after that I execute mkrom (sh mkrom.sh NK.nbf)
is that correct???
thanks
I think that the nbf file that I´m using is not a correct verion.
I tried to make a nbf file form jeff´s page but it doesn´t work with the nbf selection.
Do you know where can I find a nbf file that works with mkrom???
Can anybody please help me to build a rom? specially to the XDA-developers, thanks in a million...in advance.
My question is:
1. Do i need a base rom(no program included) on the cfg/(rom.nb1)? is it necessary ?
2. what is the maximum files i can put in the files/ directory? that will be splited by mkrom, i know it is depending on the version since 3.17 the maximum for all files is 5 M. how about other version. 4.01,4.05, 4.10 and 4.16
3. when i run the bash setup.sh nk.nb1(4.05), using parameter for 4.05 i get a message "!!! your rom is not known to me: md5:fb9e70c5786f08e4db6db7c184c59704" is this normal or it is not define on the splitrom.pl ?
4. what kind of editor did you use for building a BMP file with 16 bit, I tried to use adobe photoshop 6.0, but i can not seem to save it as 151 k, the option is only 24 bit and 8 bit, if you can give me a site where i can download it , i will really apreciate it.
Thanks for the Help..
More power to the XDA team
and
Welcome TMO 4.16!!! (which i think no diff with 4.10)
1. yes you do need some kind of rom to start with
2. you can check using
Code:
perl splitrom.pl yourrom.nb1 -ob <your bmp offset> | perl calcgaps.pl 0x3ffff
and add the sizes of the holes.
you have to figure out where the bootsplash is for your rom. ( for new roms this is most likely 0x81ec0000 )
3) there is a list of 27 roms I know about in splitrom, if I never saw your rom, the signature will also not be there.
btw, what rom do you have?
4) I think we used photoshop for that. ( Peter Poelman knows more about that )
thanks for the reply XDA developer Itsme,
but how can i build a baserom with the rom i have, I have a ROM 4.05 which i created in jeff's kitchen? or any site where i can download the base rom 4.05?
I have a ROM 4.05, 4.10 which i get from jeff's kitchen and also the original 4.10 TMO. regarding the signature of the ROM, i read your splitrom.pl and i found out you 27 list of roms, but i didn't find that signature "md5:fb9e70c5786f08e4db6db7c184c59704" is it because my ROM is not base ROM?
my param is ;
wincever=4
start1=21740000
size1=0040000
start2=003c0000
startbmp=81ec0000
startop=81b00000
I'll still try to use the photoshop, maybe i miss something there.
Please correct me if i done something wrong with my commands.
I have Perl 5.8 and cygwin, installed in windows 2003
then make the path for perl/bin and cygwin/bin
then i copy all the things i need to build a rom in one directory including nk.nbf(with jeff's 4.05) and mkrom tools(which i got from the demokitchen)
i run "perl setup.sh nk.nbf" to extract the bootimage.bmp and rom.nb1 to cfg/ directory
then i dump "dumprom -4 -d files -q nk.nbf" to extract all files in files directory
then i convert "perl fdf2reg.pl files/default.fdf cfg/default.reg"
"tr -d "\0" <files/initobj.dat >cfg/initobj.txt"
"cp files/initdb.ini cfg/initdb.ini"
then in files/ directory i delete all the windows files i leave only the program with the dll i wanted to add in the rom like total commander, file commander.. etc...
(I compare it with the original files of WM2003)
then i run "bash mkrom.sh out/out.nbf"
but i got an OVERLAP message on the screen
and also the same message like i told you before "Your rom is not know to me"
Please Help me with this because i want to build my own rom according to the program i need.. and many thanks.
split rom does not recognize romkitchen roms, since they vary too much.
you should use an original rom, not one from the romkitchen.
the overlap means that somehow the params file was not correct.
or maybe you just tried to add too much files.
XDA developer Itsme said:
split rom does not recognize romkitchen roms, since they vary too much.
you should use an original rom, not one from the romkitchen.
the overlap means that somehow the params file was not correct.
or maybe you just tried to add too much files.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks Itsme, thats why splti rrom can not recognize the ROM I have, I'll try to search for the base ROM in the forum, or can you give me a site where i can download the baseROM, I think that's why I am having a OVERLAP because there is a added program on my ROM, XDA-Developers File1 and File2 is duplicated.
It answer my question regarding the ROM i have, thanks a lot man you really a good help.
Now my only problem is to find all the base rom so i can start cooking some ROM.
hi to all
I managed to open the extended rom on my iMate using exteded rom tools
I even added files (*.CAB) in it and added them into the config file to install them automatically each time I make a hard reset.
My problem now is this:
I have a file that I copied into extended rom and I want it to be copied to (let us say) "\windows\" directory. Is there such a copy command in config file that i can add it to the command lines in config file? And if so what is the correct syntax
Thanks
there is.
Search in the forum.
It is smt like
CPY1: on one line indicating source
CPY2: on next line indicating target
Why dont you make a CAB file in which you can do whatever you want?
Nice thing of a CAB file is that the action will be registered (as an installed program!)
do you mean like :
cpy1: \extended_rom\kk.exe
cpy2: \windows\
to move the file kk.exe from the extended rom directory to the windows directory
and how can i read about making cab files and with which program
I have been using Win CE cab manager to make cabs, it's a great program, but the trial will only run 10 times.
http://www.ocpsoftware.com/products.php?nm=cecabmgr
andit is too expensive for me to buy... ($146)
So I have been using it sparingly to save my free goes.
to move the file kk.exe from the extended rom directory to the windows directory will look like this
cpy1: \extended_rom\kk.exe
cpy2: \windows\kk.exe
did not work
hi
i have tried the command cpy1, cpy2 to copy files within extended rom, but the files were not copied, do you have any idea why?
i am sure that i typed the path and the filename correct
thanks
Hi, I am trying to extract a file (actually, cplmain.,cpl) from a rom image. It all seems to work fine, but the size of the extracted file is lesser than the right one.
File seems to be truncated.
I did:
1) get the "B000FF" file (.bin), 24,856,907 bytes
2) Since dumprom seems not to "like" this format, I converted it using splitrom:
perl splirom.pl file.bin -wo file.rom
3) I don't know which format it generates to file to, but now dumprom works:
dumprom -d result file.rom > res.txt
4) A few snapshots of the file res.txt, regarding the file cplmain.cpl:
NOTE: section at fee73000 iso 00044000 for cplmain.cpl
806f5fe4 - 806f5ff0 L0000000c modname cplmain.cpl
8072d000 - 8076fe1c L00042e1c o32 region_0 rva=00001000 vsize=00042e1c real=02e61000 psize=00043000 f=60000020 for cplmain.cpl
80770000 - 8079e600 L0002e600 o32 region_3 rva=00048000 vsize=0002f000 real=02ea8000 psize=0002e600 f=40000040 for cplmain.cpl
808c7650 - 808c76bc L0000006c e32 struct 4 objs, img=212e entrypt=0000b408 base=02e60000 v4.20 tp9 cplmain.cpl
808c76bc - 808c771c L00000060 o32 struct cplmain.cpl
80a36870 - 80a36ff6 L00000786 o32 region_1 rva=00044000 vsize=00001800 real=01cd3000 psize=00000786 f=c0002040 for cplmain.cpl
80a4d0d8 - 80a4dffd L00000f25 o32 region_2 rva=00046000 vsize=00001ca8 real=02ea6000 psize=00000f25 f=40002040 for cplmain.cpl
80be2ed8 - 80be2ef8 L00000020 modent 20 00000005 01c3f9e1932529f0 486400 8119a000 cplmain.cpl
...............
5) Last line's "486400" is actually the *right* size of the file, but the real size of the extracted file (in directory "result") is 477,184.
I have not checked other files, since this is the one I am interested in.
Any idea?
Thanks in advance
XIP files would report incorrect size. Because they are XIP
If XIP files report wrong size (I guess you mean inside the very NB1 file), how can one fix this?
Spasiva!
I guess i am not using the same alignment of blocks in the reconstructed .exe file, as was used for constructing the rom.
it is not a really important issue, that the file is not exactly the same size.
there are also sections missing in the rom, that were in the original file, like the relocation information.
the main use of dumprom extracted modules, is that you can reverse engineer them with something like IDA. .. not that they are useful as real executables.
willem
Hi Willem,
Well the thing is that I need this file to be the right size. I agree that size is not important (that's what I actually say to my girlfriend ;-) ) as long as the extracted file's is greater, not lesser (which implies truncation) than the original's. The problem is that the file I got is smaller, so there is some missing data in.
Actually, I copy cplmain.cpl to the ppc as cplmain2.cpl, I do:
ctlpnl cplmain2.cpl,2 (for instance)
and it simply does not do anything.
Excuse my ignorance, but, what is IDA?
Dank u vel
IDA: http://www.datarescue.com/idabase/
you can't use a file extracted with dumprom on another device.
most executables and dll's ( and cpl's ) are fixed to work at a specific location in memory in one specific ROM. you can't use it on another device, it will most likely have a different memory layout.
willem
If you have two versions of the same DLL that are different only in code and data base addresses, you can restore the .reloc section and get a working DLL. I've wrote a simple program that when used with any relocation rebuilder tool would produce a working DLL. And even if DLL is not working, it is much easier to decompile it with IDA because it uses relocation information internally during analysis.
The DLLs should be exactly the same, for example they can be taken from the same ROM builds that differ only in language (of cause in this case DLLs should not be localized).
While cooking my german GPS rom I noticed that there is very little information about the ExtROM nb format. Right now we can't extract it, we can't rebuild it, we can't resize the partition.
So I figured it was time to put some research into the matter. I made a package that contains the following:
- 04_ExtROM.nb (from RUU_Trinity_HTC_GER_1.23.407.2_103_6275_1.38.00.11_108)
- extrom_dump.raw (a dump of the extrom area after flashing it)
- Content (content of the extrom, copied from device after unhiding)
The idea is to analyse how files are written from NB to flash and how they are stored inside the NB. The format should be identical with Hermes and maybe other devices.
The goals of this research are:
1) understanding the Extrom NB format
2) making an extraction tool for getting files out of extrom.nb files
3) making a rebuild tool that allows us to make custom extrom.nb files
4) Resizing the Extrom partition
Please post your findings in this thread, you can also contact me on IRC (#xda-devs on irc.freenode.net
Here's the file:
http://rapidshare.com/files/24740192/ExtromResearch.rar.html
Here's what I found out so far (only worked on it for a few minutes):
R1:
The Extrom nb seems to hold 7 versions of each file, probably for 7 different languages. Search for PP_AKv33-DefaultPage_ and you'll find:
PP_AKv33-DefaultPage_FIN-040b.CAB
PP_AKv33-DefaultPage_WWE-0409.CAB
PP_AKv33-DefaultPage_WWE-0409.CAB
PP_AKv33-DefaultPage_RUS-0419.CAB
PP_AKv33-DefaultPage_FRA-040c.CAB
PP_AKv33-DefaultPage_GER-0407.CAB
PP_AKv33-DefaultPage_FIN-040b.CAB
Those occur in the 7 different config.txt files. Maybe those cabs are not all really in the NB, at the very least they must be very similar. Otherwise it wouldn't be so easy to compress. I found 7 occurences of several cab files in the NB by searching for the first few bytes of them.
R2:
The raw dump does not contain the config.txt files (at least I couldn't find them). Maybe config.txt gets stored elsewhere. I also didn't find the cabs in the dump so far, maybe a different format or a bad dump.
I had used
pdocread.exe -w -d EXT_FLA -p Part00 0 0xa00000 extrom.raw
R3: Only one of the 7 files in NB actually is actually in the ExtROM content.
My conclusion from R1 and R3:
The extrom.nb holds information for different languages or OS versions. Depending on some information only one of those actually gets flashed.
I'm finding it strange that the extracted ext_rom and the dumped ext_rom haven't the same structure.
I own a wizard (Qtek9100) and using Typho5 to extract it from the RUU and using podcread to dump it from the phone i always get a FAT16 image file. I can then use a program like Winimage to browse and edit it as i like.
Are you sure the extracted ext_rom is correct?
I believe I did everything correctly, yes.
Trinity and Hermes are different from Wizard but my dump also seems to be FAT16. If you have experience with it could you please see if the Wizard tools work on my dump?
R4: The filesystem used for ExtROM seems to be TFAT16 (Transaction-Safe FAT).
The NB files contains 90 TFAT16 occurences. I'll see if there are tools for viewing/editing TFAT16.
ZakMcRofl said:
I believe I did everything correctly, yes.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you remove the first 0x1040 bytes from the nb file you get something looking like a FAT16 image, but still not working correctly. I wonder if the nbh decoder by itsme as a bug that produces a corrupted extension_rom?
ZakMcRofl said:
Trinity and Hermes are different from Wizard but my dump also seems to be FAT16. If you have experience with it could you please see if the Wizard tools work on my dump?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I did I downloaded your dump and used Winimage to check the raw file and it showed an empty confused FAT16 image
ZakMcRofl said:
R4: The filesystem used for ExtROM seems to be TFAT16 (Transaction-Safe FAT).
The NB files contains 90 TFAT16 occurences. I'll see if there are tools for viewing/editing TFAT16.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Winimage allows it. There's a tutorial by Faria on how to cook ext_roms and flash it back to wizards and winimage is advised
cheers
This post says otherwise (regarding TFAT16, not FAT16)
The simpliest method.
1. Take MS_.NBA (a decrypted version of MS_.NBF). Open it in any hex editor, and search for bytes "EB FE 90 4D 53 57 49 4E 34 2E 31 00" ("ыРMSWIN4.1", there would be "FAT16" string a bit lower). The string should be found near offset 0x70000. Extract everything starting from the place you've found and up to the end of file to a file named "extrom.img"
2. Open "extrom.img" in WinImage, edit it as you like, save the file
3. Open the hex aditor and place modified "extrom.img" to the same place in MS.NBA file where it was before extraction.
that's all. Convert NBF to NBA and flash your ROM.
The same method cannot be used on Universal. It has TFAT16 instead of FAT16, WinImage knows nothing about TFAT and destroys FAT table. But there is a simple workaround.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Source: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=847312&postcount=10
Well, winimage works perfectly with wizard nb files (decrypted nbf files)
Yes, apparently Wizard uses FAT16 whereas Universal (and Trinity Extrom) use TFAT16. The former can be opened, the latter not.
I'm currently compiling a file list for further analysis.
ZakMcRofl said:
Yes, apparently Wizard uses FAT16 whereas Universal (and Trinity Extrom) use TFAT16. The former can be opened, the latter not.
I'm currently compiling a file list for further analysis.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe that's why Wizard's extended roms get corrupted when users try to delete files in it. Perhaps WM5 or WM6 use TFAT16 upon rebooting and it
screws up the reading
Filelist
I took the content files and searched for their occurrences in extrom.nb.
Here is the filelist with hex positions:
Code:
0x0000A280 BT_Table.CAB
0x0001F3B0 Config.txt (FIN)
0x00020A08 HTC_WM5DST_signed.cab
0x000485D0 MP_CVSDcpl_20060920.cab
0x000685B0 PP_AKv30-DefaultPage_ALL.CAB
0x0007DCF8 PP_AKv33-DefaultPage_???.CAB
0x00093850 PP_ExtVersion.xml
0x000956C8 PP_FixITS2654_SMD.CAB
0x000A2800 BT_Table.CAB
0x000B7930 Config.txt (WWE)
0x000B8F88 HTC_WM5DST_signed.cab
0x000E0B50 MP_CVSDcpl_20060920.cab
0x00100B30 PP_AKv30-DefaultPage_ALL.CAB
0x0012B7B8 PP_ExtVersion.xml
0x0012D630 PP_FixITS2654_SMD.CAB
0x0013A768 BT_Table.CAB
0x0014F898 Config.txt (WWE)
0x00150EF0 HTC_WM5DST_signed.cab
0x00178AB8 MP_CVSDcpl_20060920.cab
0x00198A98 PP_AKv30-DefaultPage_ALL.CAB
0x001C3720 PP_ExtVersion.xml
0x001C5598 PP_FixITS2654_SMD.CAB
0x001D26D0 BT_Table.CAB
0x001E7800 Config.txt (RUS)
0x001E8E58 HTC_WM5DST_signed.cab
0x00210A20 MP_CVSDcpl_20060920.cab
0x00230A00 PP_AKv30-DefaultPage_ALL.CAB
0x00246148 PP_AKv33-DefaultPage_???.CAB
0x0025BCA0 PP_ExtVersion.xml
0x0025DB18 PP_FixITS2654_SMD.CAB
0x0026AC50 BT_Table.CAB
0x0027FD80 Config.txt (FRA)
0x002813D8 HTC_WM5DST_signed.cab
0x002A8FA0 MP_CVSDcpl_20060920.cab
0x002C8F80 PP_AKv30-DefaultPage_ALL.CAB
0x002DE6C8 PP_AKv33-DefaultPage_???.CAB
0x002F4220 PP_ExtVersion.xml
0x002F6098 PP_FixITS2654_SMD.CAB
0x003031D0 BT_Table.CAB
0x00318300 Config.txt (GER)
0x00319958 HTC_WM5DST_signed.cab
0x00341520 MP_CVSDcpl_20060920.cab
0x00361500 PP_AKv30-DefaultPage_ALL.CAB
0x00376C48 PP_AKv33-DefaultPage_GER-0407.CAB
0x0038C7A0 PP_ExtVersion.xml
0x0038E618 PP_FixITS2654_SMD.CAB
0x0050DE80 MP_CVSDcpl_20060920.cab
0x00527EE8 Config.txt (FIN)
0x005282F8 HTC_WM5DST_signed.cab
0x005C9298 PP_AKv30-DefaultPage_ALL.CAB
0x005DE9E0 PP_AKv33-DefaultPage_???CAB
0x005F4538 PP_ExtVersion.xml
0x005F63B0 PP_FixITS2654_SMD.CAB
R5: Files are stored sequentially for each language.
I haven't found where the offsets and how the offsets are stored, maybe relative to the beginning of a language section. I haven't found the absolute offsets anywhere yet.