Most people on this forum have tinkerer with their xoom, and at some point ran quadrant and linpack. I'm curious as to who has the fastest benchmark xoom.
We all know benchmarks don't mean squat in the real world but its still cool to OC it and see what it will do.
So post up your quadrant and linpack scores and at what speed
Mine @ 1.6
Quadrant 4513, it ran 4517 however was unable to get a screen shot.
68.772 linpack. Ranks 124 of all devices
I got 4157 as my highest on quad (1.6 ghz) but I got a 69.4 on linpack (screenshot lost when I had to flash stock images to recover, also at 1.6 ghz) ( its a GIF, so the app doesn't like it)
http://db.tt/GQ8XznI
Sent from my Xoom using XDA Premium App
This is kinda weird for a brag I guess, but I get 3758 on quadrant and 60 on linpack with the 1.4ghz 1.4.2 kernel.
Related
Ok so the benchmarks on youtube I have been seeing for evo is average around 8 MFLOPS on linpack and 400 or below for quadrant.. When I get around 1166 for quadrant and 32-34 MFLOPS on linpack.. How is this because they do this testing evo with one or more devices and im on stock froyo.. Anyone have numbers for stock or overclocked or rooted? Just would like to see some numbers to compare..
sent from my Evo
2.2 increased linpaq scores because it is not JIT enabled. Also speeds up other benchmark tools.
also do a search for neifs rom comparison chart that is posted somewhere here.
engagedtosmile said:
2.2 increased linpaq scores because it is not JIT enabled. Also speeds up other benchmark tools.
also do a search for neifs rom comparison chart that is posted somewhere here.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Will do thanks
sent from my Evo
Please share it. Thank you
Sent from my X10a using Tapatalk
539 Quadrant....
whats the point in benchmarking if its limited to 30fps?
neocore 27.7 fps
517 Quadrant
552
.
Quadrant - 547
Linpack - 6.973 MFLOP/s
james_2k said:
whats the point in benchmarking if its limited to 30fps?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There's lots of benchmarks you can do.. not just video recording... also a danger of this thread being a mess as everyone uses different tools.. It'll only be useful if people use the same benchmarking tools such as Quadrant and linpak.
i got 553 [Quadrant Advance]
little bit dissapointed, nexus 2.1, and motodroid 2.1 are better than ours,
quadrant :
517
sooo slow
quadrant - 560
quadrant 530
573.......
Quadrant: 517. Why is it so low? Ideas?
Linpack: 6,95 MFLOP/s
536 on mine
670 Quadrant
9.2 MFLOPS on Linpack
wtf, 670? sorry i'm gonna want some proof for that
http://db.tt/tlimV6b
http://db.tt/XXtlV8k
Quadrant: 1756
yeah, that's right it's not my X10, it's My Galaxy S
X10: 570
why is this varying between devices running on the same OS version??
Shouldn't our scores be the same? For the person who scored over 600 - are you running ADW launcher? I have a feeling ADW launcher is causing my score to be low by using too much of the CPU resources?!
I'm running Cyanogen Mod 7 v 2.5 Gingerbread on my HD2 which is clocked at 1.536Ghz.
Best quadrant score I could pull was 1418, with results being inconsistent every time I run the test.
Best score in linpack was 41 MFLOPS.
Best CPU bench score was 672ms.
Now, don't get me wrong. I know these scores are a def improvement over stock and nothing to sneer at, but I've seen HD2's that only run at 1.1 - 1.2Ghz with Froyo in the 1600+ Quadrant/60 MFLOPS+ CPU bench range.
I'm kinda stumped here. What's up?
Hi,
as i'm using my iconia a500 i noticed some heavy Performance issues. i rooted and installed several Roms but my Quadrant score keeps being low. right now i am on lightspeed 1.0.1 with Richard's Kernel and my Quadrant score is only 656!!!
i'm really curious about this any suggestions?
thanks in advance
kiark
Just a guess, but the cpu probably is not running full during the test. Might have to use a app to force to 1000 during the test.
Running 2.4 kernel? If so, the default intersctive scaling governor is borked so either use setcpu to change to on demand or flash back to 2.3. Im personally running 1.6ghz as max speed with on demand.
thank u very much, setting the cpu up with setcpu worked!
CPU really does not have much effect on quadrant score. It is the combination of the Rom and the kernel it self.
Sent from my SGS-t959 using XDA Premium App
IM using the xoom 3.2 rom
My acer is over clocked to 1.5 and here are my benchmark scores.
Useing Quadrant I got 3421 (best of three runs) and frame rates around 45
Useing Linpack I got 45.438 mflpos on single thread in 1.85 seconds and
71.53 mflops on multi-thread in 2.36 seconds again best of three runs
Useing AnTuTu Benchmark I got a score of 6159 and frame rates right at around 60 fps
Useing Vellamo (its new and a benchmark tool for a tablets browser to see how ell the browser performs does things like java and flash stress tests and load speeds of web pages) I got a score of 1072
naturallight said:
CPU really does not have much effect on quadrant score. It is the combination of the Rom and the kernel it self.
Sent from my SGS-t959 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
not sure on this. if it doesnt have much effect why do you see such a huge difference between 216 Mhz and 1.5 Ghz clock speeds in quadrant?
Hello,
What is your bench score with QUADRANT BENCHMARK
the mine is 1550 with hc3.1 OTA, Villain_iconia_kernel_2.5 kernel
Quandrant Score : 3423
Acer Iconia A500
Villian_Iconia_Kernel 3.2
LightSpeed Rom
over clocked to 1.4ghz
MrTonyToca said:
Quandrant Score : 3423
Acer Iconia A500
Villian_Iconia_Kernel 3.2
LightSpeed Rom
over clocked to 1.4ghz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How does it get that high? Mine is oc. To 1.5 and my highest is 2100!
Sent from my ADR6300 using XDA Premium App
monkey10120 said:
How does it get that high? Mine is oc. To 1.5 and my highest is 2100!
Sent from my ADR6300 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't know, It might be the Rom.....Its the newest version of the Light Speed Rom....OC'd to 1.4ghz using SetCPU Ondemand governer , with the Honey Villian_Iconia_Kernel 3.2, thats the highest I've gotten but since I've flashed both it has ranged from 2800-3300
[ROM][26/08]Lightspeed_1.0.2[HC3.2]
[KERNEL] Stock/HV/Taboonay V3.3 for HC 3.2 07-09 - 1.64Ghz/UV control
quadrant is very unreliable. to some searching on it, it is easy to manipulate I/O or other factors just get high scores. Doesn't really mean it is a great ROM/kernel combo. I've seen posts where people can get their quadrant score upwards of 20,000. All benchmarks apps have their pros and cons but from i've been told/seen in threads CF bench and vellamo seem to be the most reliable.
mburke178 said:
quadrant is very unreliable. to some searching on it, it is easy to manipulate I/O or other factors just get high scores. Doesn't really mean it is a great ROM/kernel combo. I've seen posts where people can get their quadrant score upwards of 20,000. All benchmarks apps have their pros and cons but from i've been told/seen in threads CF bench and vellamo seem to be the most reliable.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've also tried Smartbench 2011, since it measures both cores instead of one and push around 4400 there.....Im loving the speed on this thing....